Investigations on the genotoxic potential of styrene in Fischer 344 rats using multiple endpoints.

Genotoxicity of styrene monomer was evaluated in male Fischer 344 rats using the alkaline comet assay for DNA damage, micronucleus assay for cytogenetic damage and the Pig-a assay for gene mutations. In a dose range finding (DRF) study, styrene was administered by oral gavage in corn oil for 28 consecutive days at 0, 100, 500, and 1000 mg/kg/day. The bioavailability of styrene was confirmed in the DRF by measuring its plasma levels at approximately 7- or 15-min following dosing. The 1000 mg/kg/day group exceeded the maximum tolerated dose based on body weight and organ weight changes and signs of central nervous system depression. Based on these findings, doses of 0, 100, 250, and 500 mg/kg/day (for 28 or 29 days) were selected for the genotoxicity assays. Animals were sacrificed 3-4 h after treatment on Day 28 or 29 for assessing various genotoxicity endpoints. Pig-a mutant frequencies and micronucleus frequencies were determined in peripheral blood erythrocytes. The comet assay was conducted in the glandular stomach, duodenum, liver, lung, and kidney. These studies were conducted in accordance with the relevant OECD test guidelines. Oral administration of styrene did not lead to genotoxicity in any of the investigated endpoints. The adequacy of the experimental conditions was assured by including animals treated by oral gavage with the positive control chemicals ethyl nitrosourea and ethyl methane sulfonate. Results from these studies supplement to the growing body of evidence suggesting the lack of in vivo genotoxic potential for styrene.

Effect of cell treatment procedures on in vitro genotoxicity assessment.

So far, the majority of in vitro toxicological experiments are conducted after an acute 24 h treatment that does not represent a realistic human chemical exposure. Recently, new in vitro approaches have been proposed to study the chemical toxicological effect over several days in order to be more predictive of a representative exposure scenario. In this study, we investigated the genotoxic potential of chemicals (direct or bioactived clastogen, aneugen and apoptotic inducer) with the γH2AX and pH3 biomarkers, in the human liver-derived HepaRP cell line. We used different treatment durations, with or without a three-day recovery stage (release period), before genotoxicity measurement. Data were analysed with the Benchmark Dose approach. We observed that the detection of clastogenic compounds (notably for DNA damaging agents) was more sensitive after three days of repeated treatment compared to one or three treatments over 24 h. In contrast, aneugenic chemicals were detected as genotoxic in a similar manner whether after a 24 h exposure or a three-day repeated treatment. Globally, the release period decreases the genotoxicity measurement substantially. For DNA damaging agents, after high concentration treatments, γH2AX induction was always observed after a three-day release period. In contrast, for DNA topoisomerase inhibitors, no effect could be observed after the release period. In conclusion, in the HepaRP cell line, there are some important differences between a one-day acute and a three-day repeated treatment protocol, indicating that different cell treatment procedures may differentiate chemical genotoxic mechanisms of action more efficiently.

Strategy proposal using QSAR models to approach mutagenicity assessment of non intentionally added substances in recycled plastic resins.

CONTEXT: Transition to the use of recycled plastics raises an issue concerning safety assessment of Non Intentionally Added Substances (NIAS). To assess the mutagenic potential of the recycled polyethylene impurities and to evaluate the need to perform in vitro assays on recycled resins, this study lies in identifying existing NIAS associated with recycled Low/High Density Polyethylene and assessing the mutagenicity data-gaps by employing in silico tools. METHODS: Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) models predicting Ames mutagenicity were selected from literature, then NIAS were run to 1/evaluate performances of each model, 2/apply a QSAR strategy on the NIAS molecular space and address data-gaps. RESULTS: Among the 165 NIAS identified, experimental Ames results were not found for 50 substances while the substances with experimental data were predominantly negatives. No individual model was able to predict all NIAS due to applicability domain limitations. Taking into account 1/calculated performances, 2/availability of applicability domain, 3/description of the Training Set, an Integrated Strategy was founded including Sarpy, Consensus and Protox to extend the applicability domain. CONCLUSION & PERSPECTIVES: Existing data and predictions generated by this strategy suggest a low mutagenic potential of NIAS. Further investigation is needed to explore other genotoxicity mechanisms.

An integrated in vitro carcinogenicity test that distinguishes between genotoxic carcinogens, non-genotoxic carcinogens, and non-carcinogens.

Chemical safety testing plays a crucial role in product and pharmacological development, as well as chemoprevention; however, in vitro genotoxicity safety tests do not always accurately predict the chemicals that will be in vivo carcinogens. If chemicals test positive in vitro for genotoxicity but negative in vivo, this can contribute to unnecessary testing in animals used to confirm erroneous in vitro positive results. Current in vitro tests typically evaluate only genotoxicity endpoints, which limits their potential to detect non-genotoxic carcinogens. The frequency of misleading in vitro positive results can be high, leading to a requirement for more informative in vitro tests. It is now recognized that multiple-endpoint genotoxicity testing may aid more accurate detection of carcinogens and non-carcinogens. The objective of this review was to evaluate the utility of our novel, multiple-endpoint in vitro test, which uses multiple cancer-relevant endpoints to predict carcinogenic potential. The tool assessed micronucleus frequency, p53 expression, p21 expression, mitochondrial respiration, cell cycle abnormalities and, uniquely, cell morphology changes in human lymphoblastoid cell lines, TK6 and MCL-5. The endpoints were used to observe cellular responses to 18 chemicals within the following categories: genotoxic carcinogens, non-genotoxic carcinogens, toxic non-carcinogens, and misleading in vitro positive and negative agents. The number of endpoints significantly altered for each chemical was considered, alongside the holistic Integrated Signature of Carcinogenicity score, derived from the sum of fold changes for all endpoints. Following the calculation of an overall score from these measures, carcinogens exhibited greater potency than non-carcinogens. Genotoxic carcinogens were generally more potent than non-genotoxic carcinogens. This novel approach therefore demonstrated potential for correctly predicting whether chemicals with unknown mechanism may be considered carcinogens. Overall, while further validation is recommended, the test demonstrates potential for the identification of carcinogenic compounds. Adoption of the approach could enable reduced animal use in carcinogenicity testing.

Mutagenicity assessment of two potential impurities in preparations of 5-amino-2,4,6 triiodoisophthalic acid, a key intermediate in the synthesis of the iodinated contrast agent iopamidol.

5-Aminoisophthalic acid and 5-nitroisophthalic acid (5-NIPA) are potential impurities in preparations of 5-amino-2,4,6-triiodoisophthalic acid, which is a key intermediate in the synthesis of the iodinated contrast agent iopamidol. We have studied their mutagenicity in silico (quantitative structure-activity relationships, QSAR) and by the bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test). First, the compounds were screened with the tools Derek Nexus™ and Leadscope®. Both compounds were flagged as potentially mutagenic (class 3 under ICH M7). However, contrary to the in silico prediction, neither chemical was mutagenic in the Ames test (plate incorporation method) with or without S9 metabolic activation.

Assessment of the performance of the Ames MPF™ assay: A multicenter collaborative study with six coded chemicals.

The Ames MPF™ is a miniaturized, microplate fluctuation format of the Ames test. It is a standardized, commercially available product which can be used to assess mutagenicity in Salmonella and E. coli strains in 384-well plates using a color change-based readout. Several peer-reviewed comparisons of the Ames MPF™ to the Ames test in Petri dishes confirmed its suitability to evaluate the mutagenic potential of a variety of test items. An international multicenter study involving seven laboratories tested six coded chemicals with this assay using five bacterial strains, as recommended by the OECD test guideline 471. The data generated by the participating laboratories was in excellent agreement (93%), and the similarity of their dose response curves, as analyzed with sophisticated statistical approaches further confirmed the suitability of the Ames MPF™ assay as an alternative to the Ames test on agar plates, but with advantages with respect to significantly reduced amount of test substance and S9 requirements, speed, hands-on time and, potentially automation.

The assessment and communication of genotoxicity test results: moving beyond binary.

Potential genotoxicity is one of the essential considerations in the safety assessment of chemicals to which humans may be exposed. Several endpoints are used to evaluate genotoxicity, but, in each case, a binary assessment (negative/positive) is demanded by regulators. The use of binary assessment has rarely been questioned, although we have pointed out some questions and difficulties with regard to the statistical methods used and the evaluation of biological significance, both of which inform the calls of negative/ positive. Here, we discuss these issues further, focusing on ambiguity and uncertainty in the binary paradigm, and we seek a new direction for genotoxicity assessment. To this end, we need to understand, acknowledge, and accept these ambiguities and study-related uncertainties and then to consider new strategies for safety assessment. We also discuss the communication of ambiguity and uncertainty in risk communication.

Formation of hepatocyte cytoplasmic inclusions and their contribution to methylcarbamate-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in F344 rats.

Methylcarbamate (MC), a reaction product between dimethyl dicarbonate and ammonia or ammonium ion, is a potent hepatocarcinogen in F344 rats. Various genotoxicity tests have shown negative results for MC. Although previous studies have described the effects of MC on the liver, including the formation of characteristic basophilic cytoplasmic inclusions (CIs) in hepatocytes, the toxicological significance of CIs and their involvement in hepatocarcinogenesis remain unclear. In the current study, to elucidate the mechanisms of MC hepatocarcinogenesis, we examined hepatotoxicity and genotoxicity after 4 weeks of administration of MC using gpt delta rats with an F344 genetic background as a reporter gene transgenic animal model. Histopathologically, single-cell necrosis, karyomegaly, and the formation of CIs positive for Feulgen staining were observed in hepatocytes at the carcinogenic dose, demonstrating the hepatotoxicity of MC. CIs were also detected as large micronuclei in liver micronucleus tests but not in the bone marrow, suggesting that MC could cause chromosomal instability specifically in the livers of rats. Reporter gene mutation assays demonstrated that MC did not induce mutagenicity even in the liver. Immunofluorescence analyses revealed that CIs exhibited loss of nuclear envelope integrity, increased heterochromatinization, and accumulation of DNA damage. An increase in liver STING protein levels suggested an effect on the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase/stimulator of interferon genes innate immune pathway. Overall, these data demonstrated the possible occurrence of chromothripsis-like chromosomal rearrangements via CIs. Thus, the formation of CIs could be a crucial event in the early stage of MC-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in F344 rats.

Mutagenicity Assessment of Homologous Series of Methyl Ester Sulphonates (MES) Using the Bacterial Reverse Mutation (Ames) Test.

Methyl ester sulphonate (MES) is an anionic surfactant that is suitable to be used as an active ingredient in household products. Four palm-based MES compounds with various carbon chains, namely C12, C14, C16 and C16/18 MES, were assayed by the in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537 and the Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA, with the aim of establishing the safety data of the compounds, specifically their mutagenicity. The test was also carried out on linear alkylbenzene sulphonate (LAS) for comparison. The plate incorporation method was conducted according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Test Guideline 471. All compounds were tested at five analysable non-cytotoxic concentrations, varying from .001 mg/plate to 5 mg/plate, with and without S-9 metabolic activation. All tested concentrations showed no significant increase in the number of revertant colonies compared to revertant colonies of the negative control. The Ames test indicated that each concentration of C12, C14, C16, C16/18 MES, and LAS used in this study induced neither base-pair substitutions nor frame-shift mutations in the S. typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537 and the E. coli strain WP2 uvrA. The results showed that C12, C14, C16 and C16/18 MES have no potential mutagenic properties in the presence and absence of S-9 metabolic activation, similarly to LAS. Therefore, the MES is safe to be used as an alternative to petroleum-based surfactants for household cleaning products.

Cellular toxicity and DNA damage induced by Newbouldia laevis used for male infertility treatment in prokaryotic and eukaryotic models.

Leaves of Newbouldia laevis have been extensively used in solving problems associated with infertility and childbirth in many African countries. Yet, information is very limited on the DNA damaging potential of this plant. This study evaluated the cytogenotoxic effect of the aqueous extract of N. laevis leaf using prokaryotic models (Ames Salmonella fluctuation test using TA100 and TA98 strains of Salmonella typhimurium and SOS Chromotest with Escherichia coli PQ37) and eukaryotic model (Allium cepa root cells). Identification of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and phytochemical screening of the plant extract were also performed. Onion bulbs were grown on each concentration (1 to 50%; v/v, extract/tap water) of the extract for chromosomal aberrations and root growth analyses. Results of the Ames test indicated that the extract is mutagenic while the SOS Chromotest results showed good complementation to the Ames test results, although the E. coli PQ37 system showed slightly higher sensitivity in the detection of mutagenicity and genotoxicity of the extract. The plant extract was cytotoxic when compared to the control, inducing a significant (p < 0.05) concentration-dependent inhibition of root growth from 5 to 50% concentrations. At 50% concentration, the extract completely inhibited cell division in the A. cepa. Also, chromosomal aberration increased significantly (p < 0.05) in exposed onions from 5 to 20% concentrations. The mutagenicity and cytogenotoxicity recorded in this report were believed to be caused by the presence of VOCs such as 1,2,3-benzene-triol, 1,2-benzenediol, and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, and alkaloids in the extract an indication of the cytogenotoxicity of the aqueous extract of N. laevis leaf even at low concentration.

Ames test study designs for nitrosamine mutagenicity testing: qualitative and quantitative analysis of key assay parameters.

The robust control of genotoxic N-nitrosamine (NA) impurities is an important safety consideration for the pharmaceutical industry, especially considering recent drug product withdrawals. NAs belong to the 'cohort of concern' list of genotoxic impurities (ICH M7) because of the mutagenic and carcinogenic potency of this chemical class. In addition, regulatory concerns exist regarding the capacity of the Ames test to predict the carcinogenic potential of NAs because of historically discordant results. The reasons postulated to explain these discordant data generally point to aspects of Ames test study design. These include vehicle solvent choice, liver S9 species, bacterial strain, compound concentration, and use of pre-incubation versus plate incorporation methods. Many of these concerns have their roots in historical data generated prior to the harmonization of Ames test guidelines. Therefore, we investigated various Ames test assay parameters and used qualitative analysis and quantitative benchmark dose modelling to identify which combinations provided the most sensitive conditions in terms of mutagenic potency. Two alkyl-nitrosamines, N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) and N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) were studied. NDMA and NDEA mutagenicity was readily detected in the Ames test and key assay parameters were identified that contributed to assay sensitivity rankings. The pre-incubation method (30-min incubation), appropriate vehicle (water or methanol), and hamster-induced liver S9, alongside Salmonella typhimurium strains TA100 and TA1535 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA(pKM101) provide the most sensitive combination of assay parameters in terms of NDMA and NDEA mutagenic potency in the Ames test. Using these parameters and further quantitative benchmark dose modelling, we show that N-nitrosomethylethylamine (NMEA) is positive in Ames test and therefore should no longer be considered a historically discordant NA. The results presented herein define a sensitive Ames test design that can be deployed for the assessment of NAs to support robust impurity qualifications.

Assessment of the genotoxic and mutagenic effects induced by T-2 mycotoxin in HepG2 cells.

The T-2 toxin is a mycotoxin produced by molds belonging to Fusarium. Among the Fusarium mycotoxins, trichothecenes are frequently reported in food and feed, being the T-2 toxin (T-2) the mycotoxin which possesses the highest toxicity. According to EFSA, T-2 is found in various cereal grains used in food and feed products, mainly in oats, and it has a high environmental impact due to its mechanisms of toxicity. However, recent information on its genotoxic and mutagenic effects is lacking. This work aimed to evaluate the genotoxic and mutagenic potential of T-2 in vitro. For this purpose, HepG2 cells were exposed to 15, 30, and 60 nM T-2 for 24 h, then the DNA damage was evaluated by the micronucleus and the comet assays. In addition, point mutation analysis was performed by the bacterial reverse mutation test using 0.15-60 nM of T-2 concentrations. The results showed chromosomal damage at 60 nM T-2 since significantly more MN appeared at this concentration than in the control samples. Regarding the comet assay, DNA double helix breaks appeared at all concentrations tested and, in a concentration-dependent manner. However, no mutagenic effects were observed at any of the concentrations tested for the Salmonella typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, or the Escherichia coli (E. Coli) WP2 strain in the absence or presence of a metabolic activation system. Therefore, these results showed that T-2 mycotoxin produced genotoxic effects by MN and comet assay, while no mutagenicity was observed. However, further research simulating different metabolic activation pathways and the combined exposure of this mycotoxin with other mutagenic chemicals that could be present in the diet is necessary to discard the mutagenic potential of T-2 fully. These results highlight the carcinogenic potential and danger associated with T-2 exposure and should be considered to prevent associated food risks for the human population.

Guidance for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring anti-genotoxicity.

Since DNA damage can occur spontaneously or be produced by the environmental genotoxins in living cells, it is important to investigate compounds that can reverse or protect DNA damage. An appropriate methodology is essential for the responsive identification of protection offered against DNA damage. This review includes information on the current state of knowledge on prokaryotic cell-based assays (SOS chromotest, umu test, vitotox assay) and cytogenetic techniques (micronucleus assay, chromosome aberration test and sister chromatid exchange assay) with an emphasis on the possibility to explore genoprotective compounds. Throughout the last decade, studies have extrapolated the scientific methodologies utilized for genotoxicity to assess genoprotective compounds. Therefore, shortcomings of genotoxicity studies are also mirrored in antigenotoxicity studies. While regulatory authorities around the world (OECD, US-EPA and ICH) continue to update diverse genotoxic assay strategies, there are still no clear guidelines/approaches for efficient experimental design to screen genoprotective compounds. As a consequence, non-synergetic and inconsistent implementation of the test method by the researchers to execute such simulations has been adopted, which inevitably results in unreliable findings. The review has made the first attempt to collect various facets of experimentally verified approaches for evaluating genoprotective compounds, as well as to acknowledge potential significance and constraints, and further focus on the assessment of end points which are required to validate such action. Henceforth, the review makes an incredible commitment by permitting readers to equate several components of their test arrangement with the provided simplified information, allowing the selection of convenient technique for the predefined compound from a central repository.

Cytotoxicity, mutagenicity and genotoxicity of electronic cigarettes emission aerosols compared to cigarette smoke: the REPLICA project.

Concerns have recently increased that the integrity of some scientific research is questionable due to the inability to reproduce the claimed results of some experiments and thereby confirm that the original researcher's conclusions were justified. This phenomenon has been described as 'reproducibility crisis' and affects various fields from medicine to basic applied sciences. In this context, the REPLICA project aims to replicate previously conducted in vitro studies on the toxicity of cigarette smoke and e-cigarette aerosol, sometimes adding experiments or conditions where necessary, in order to verify the robustness and replicability of the data. In this work the REPLICA Team replicated biological and toxicological assessment published by Rudd and colleagues in 2020. As in the original paper, we performed Neutral Red Uptake (NRU) assay for the evaluation of cytotoxicity, Ames test for the evaluation of mutagenesis and In Vitro Micronuclei (IVMN) assay for the evaluation of genotoxicity on cells treated with cigarette smoke or e-cigarette aerosol. The results showed high cytotoxicity, mutagenicity and genotoxicity induced by cigarette smoke, but slight or no cytotoxic, mutagenic and genotoxic effects induced by the e-cigarette aerosol. Although the two studies presented some methodological differences, the findings supported those previously presented by Rudd and colleagues.

Acute, subchronic toxicity and genotoxicity studies of JointAlive, a traditional Chinese medicine formulation for knee osteoarthritis.

AIM: In vivo and in vitro toxicity tests of JointAlive® were studied in animal models to support the safe use of JointAlive® as a drug for knee osteoarthritis treatment. METHODS: The acute toxicity study in Sprague Dawley (SD) rats was conducted at a 20 g/kg bw/day dose of JointAlive®. For 13-week subchronic toxicity tests, SD rats were orally dosed daily with 0.5, 1.5 and 5 g/kg bw/day of JointAlive®. To assess the potential genotoxicity, Ames test, cellular chromosome aberration and mouse micronucleus test in vivo were carried out. RESULTS: Based on a lack of notable findings other than histopathology finding of co-incidental prostate inflammation at the high dose, the "No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL)" of JointAlive® was concluded as 5 g/kg bw/day in males and females. Results also indicated that JointAlive® has no risk of genotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: General toxicity and genotoxicity studies empirically demonstrated that JointAlive® poses a low risk of potential health risks, providing safety supports for the application of JointAlive® as a potential drug candidate to treat knee osteoarthritis.

Exposure to nanoplastic particles and DNA damage in mammalian cells.

There is concern about human exposure to nanoplastics from intentional use or degradation of plastics in the environment. This review assesses genotoxic effects of nanoplastics, defined as particles with a primary size of less than 1000 nm. The majority of results on genotoxicity come from studies on polystyrene (PS) particles in mammalian cell cultures. Most studies have measured DNA strand breaks (standard comet assay), oxidatively damaged DNA (Fpg-modified comet assay) and micronuclei. Twenty-nine out of 60 results have shown statistically significant genotoxic effects by PS exposure in cell cultures. A statistical analysis indicates that especially modified PS particles are genotoxic (odds ratio = 8.6, 95 % CI: 1.6, 46) and immune cells seems to be more sensitive to genotoxicity than other cell types such as epithelial cells (odds ratio = 8.0, 95 % CI: 1.6, 39). On the contrary, there is not a clear association between statistically significant effects in genotoxicity tests and the primary size of PS particles, (i.e. smaller versus larger than 100 nm) or between the type of genotoxic endpoint (i.e. repairable versus permanent DNA lesions). Three studies of PS particle exposure in animals have shown increased level of DNA strand breaks in leukocytes and prefrontal cortex cells. Nanoplastics from polyethylene, propylene, polyvinyl chloride and polyethylene terephthalate have been investigated in very few studies and it is currently not possible to draw conclusion about their genotoxic hazard. In summary, there is some evidence suggesting that PS particles may be genotoxic in mammalian cells.

Comparison of the transgenic rodent mutation assay, error corrected next generation duplex sequencing, and the alkaline comet assay to detect dose-related mutations following exposure to N-nitrosodiethylamine.

N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), a well-studied N-nitrosamine, was tested in rats to compare the dose-response relationship of three genotoxicity endpoints. Mutant / mutation frequencies were determined using the transgenic rodent (TGR) gene mutation assay and error corrected next generation sequencing (ecNGS) (i.e., duplex sequencing (DS)), and genetic damage was detected by the alkaline comet assay. Big Blue® (cII Locus) animals (n = 6 per dose group) were administered doses of 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 3 mg/kg/day NDEA by oral gavage. Samples were collected for cII mutation and DS analyses following 28-days of exposure and 3 days recovery. In a separate study, male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (n = 6 per dose group) were administered the same doses by oral gavage for two consecutive days and then samples collected for the alkaline comet assay. A dose-related increase in mutant / mutation frequencies of the liver but not duodenum was observed using the TGR assay and DS with DS resulting in a slightly more sensitive response, with a lower benchmark dose (BMD). In addition, a dose-related increase in percent tail DNA was observed in the liver using the alkaline comet assay. Therefore, DS and comet assays showed good utility for hazard identification and dose-response analysis of a representative N-nitrosamine comparable to the TGR gene mutation assay.

Salmonella mutant strains resistant to herbicides - Acetohydroxyacid synthase inhibitors and their use at the Ames test.

Cytotoxicity of some pesticides is a disadvantage for the Salmonella/microsome assay with regard to the equivalence assessment of pesticide technical grade active ingredients to the original products and detection of low-level impurities. The technical grade active ingredients (TGAIs) of pesticides from certain chemical classes were found to be toxic for Salmonella typhimurium strains. Among the highly cytotoxic compounds were sulfonylureas, which include 20 active ingredients. In addition, this class includes active pharmaceutical ingredients used for the manufacture of antidiabetics drugs. A traditional selection methodology was applied using the cultivation of S. typhimurium TA100 in the presence of high concentrations of thifensulfuronmethyl (TFSM) to obtain a resistant test strain insusceptible to sulfonylurea toxic effect. Two strains resistant not only to sulfonylureas (SFU) but also triazolepyrimidines were received. The first mutant strain (deposited as S. typhimurium VKPM B-14099 in the Russian National Collection of Industrial Microorganisms) demonstrated the TA100 phenotypic characteristics: hisG46, rfa, ΔuvrB-bio, pKM101. The second strain (deposited as S. typhimurium VKPM B-14359) showed the TA1535 phenotypic characteristics and probably lost the R-factor due to the selection using the poor Gm-media with TFSM. Positive controls caused pronounced mutagenic effects (±S9) in both strains, consequently the mutants did not lose the ability to respond to induction of the reverse gene mutations. The maximum non-cytotoxic concentrations of SFUs and triazole-pyrimidines for the Ames test strains did not exceed 0.05-0.125 mg/plate, while no evidence of cytotoxicity was observed for the mutants up to 5.0 mg/plate. Electron microscopy of the ultrathin sections of Salmonella cells grown with and without TFSM showed an obvious difference in the structure of the cell wall and cytoplasm in mutant and parental cultures. The concurrent resistance both to SFU and triazolepyrimidines was assumed to be mediated by the same mechanism of action of the pesticides from these classes - inhibition of acetohydroxyacid synthase. To confirm this hypothesis, the tests in the presence of branched-chain amino acids were carried out. The enrichment of agar with isoleucine prevented the toxic effects of SFU and triazolepyrimidines for all Ames test strains used in the study, while strong cytotoxicity was observed in the presence of valine and leucine. Considering the tolerance of strains both to SFU and triazolpyrimidines and the results with branched-chain amino acids, the modification of target acetohydroxyacid synthase was supposed the key to the acquired resistance. The new strains resistant to sulfonylureas and triazole-pyrimidines expands the possibilities to reveal mutagenic impurities that may occur in TGAIs in small amounts.

International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT): Origins, achievements and ambitions.

Over the past thirty years, the International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) became one of the leading groups in the field of regulatory genotoxicology, not only due to the diversity of participants with respect to geography and professional affiliation, but also due to the unique setup of recurring IWGT meetings every four years. The hallmarks of the IWGT process have been diligent initial planning approaches of the working groups, collection of data so as to stimulate data-driven discussions and debate, and striving to reach consensus recommendations. The scientific quality of the Working Groups (WGs) has been exceptional due to the selection of highly regarded experts on each topic. As a result, the IWGT working group reports have become important documents. The deliberations and publications have provided guidance on test systems and testing protocols that have influenced the development or revision of test guidelines of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), guidance by the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH), and strategic testing or data analysis approaches in general. This article summarizes the history of the IWGT, identifies some of its major achievements, and provides an outlook for the future.

DeepAmes: A deep learning-powered Ames test predictive model with potential for regulatory application.

The Ames assay is required by the regulatory agencies worldwide to assess the mutagenic potential risk of consumer products. As well as this in vitro assay, in silico approaches have been widely used to predict Ames test results as outlined in the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) guidelines. Building on this in silico approach, here we describe DeepAmes, a high performance and robust model developed with a novel deep learning (DL) approach for potential utility in regulatory science. DeepAmes was developed with a large and consistent Ames dataset (>10,000 compounds) and was compared with other five standard Machine Learning (ML) methods. Using a test set of 1,543 compounds, DeepAmes was the best performer in predicting the outcome of Ames assay. In addition, DeepAmes yielded the best and most stable performance up to when compounds were >30% outside of the applicability domain (AD). Regarding the potential for regulatory application, a revised version of DeepAmes with a much-improved sensitivity of 0.87 from 0.47. In conclusion, DeepAmes provides a DL-powered Ames test predictive model for predicting the results of Ames tests; with its defined AD and clear context of use, DeepAmes has potential for utility in regulatory application.